Plain language summary
Overweight and obesity are major risk factors for developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Men and women respond differently to weight loss programmes, with men typically losing more weight and more abdominal fat, whilst women lose more subcutaneous fat. The aim of this large multinational study was to compare the effects of weight loss induced by an 8‐week low energy diet on metabolic outcomes in overweight men and women with prediabetes. Study participants followed the Cambridge Weight Plan which is based on four formula meals, with a total of approximately 810kcal, per day, for eight weeks. Small amounts of non-starchy vegetables were allowed, as were psyllium husks in case of digestive problems. Men lost significantly more weight than women, 11.8% versus 10.3%. Insulin resistance improved similarly in men and women, but metabolic syndrome score improved more in men than in women. Men lost more fat than women and generally had more beneficial metabolic changes. Women had higher reductions in fat-free mass, bone mineral content and HDL cholesterol than men, raising the question whether rapid weight loss may have negative longer term effects for women.
Abstract
AIMS: The PREVIEW lifestyle intervention study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01777893) is, to date, the largest, multinational study concerning prevention of type-2 diabetes. We hypothesized that the initial, fixed low-energy diet (LED) would induce different metabolic outcomes in men vs women. MATERIALS AND METHODS All participants followed a LED (3.4 MJ/810 kcal/daily) for 8 weeks (Cambridge Weight Plan). Participants were recruited from 8 sites in Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Those eligible for inclusion were overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 ) individuals with pre-diabetes according to ADA-criteria. Outcomes of interest included changes in insulin resistance, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM) and metabolic syndrome Z-score. RESULTS In total, 2224 individuals (1504 women, 720 men) attended the baseline visit and 2020 (90.8%) completed the follow-up visit. Following the LED, weight loss was 16% greater in men than in women (11.8% vs 10.3%, respectively) but improvements in insulin resistance were similar. HOMA-IR decreased by 1.50 ± 0.15 in men and by 1.35 ± 0.15 in women (ns). After adjusting for differences in weight loss, men had larger reductions in metabolic syndrome Z-score, C-peptide, FM and heart rate, while women had larger reductions in HDL cholesterol, FFM, hip circumference and pulse pressure. Following the LED, 35% of participants of both genders had reverted to normo-glycaemia. CONCLUSIONS An 8-week LED induced different effects in women than in men. These findings are clinically important and suggest gender-specific changes after weight loss. It is important to investigate whether the greater decreases in FFM, hip circumference and HDL cholesterol in women after rapid weight loss compromise weight loss maintenance and future cardiovascular health.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
1
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
